Dear
Satyanarayan Gangaram
Pitroda (Sam Pitroda)
I am a common citizen of India and was
flabbergasted after reading your interview by “Mahesh Langa” Published
on “The Hindu” updated on “November 16, 2017” where you called Gujarat
model as bogus. This is same Gujarat that won over 285 awards under UPA
rule. It is Unsporting to change opinions like this. Just because UPA is not in
Government and you want to oppose the current Government that’s why you are abjuring
Gujarat growth model. The same Gujarat Government which was praised by many
congress ministers before 2014.
I can really understand your level of
frustration when you said “I find it disgusting when someone says nothing
was done in 70 years in the country” but can’t you realize the mistakes
made by congress government, which ruled India for the longest period after
independence. Still congress has not changed and trying to play same old tricks
in Gujarat elections. The level of hypocrisy is achieved when you are saying
that “India is a land of opportunities, and everyone doesn't need special
privileges for development” and ‘Rahul Gandhi’ luring a caste segment of
society for reservation. He thinks by playing this cheap politics he can win
Gujarat. ‘Sam’ Guajarati’s are intelligent people and they cannot be deluded by
this trick. You could have shown your frustration on this reservation card of
Rahul, but then, how will you prove your contiguity with that family.
As per your interview
published in “The Hindu” you have raised few concerns and all those are
concentrated around proving that Gujarat Model of development is not a
successful model. These barren comments stand nowhere on the ground of reality.
Let’s examine few of your concerns.
Your Concern 1- Gujarat State
does not spend money on women-centric schemes:
These are many schemes in Gujarat
which are designed to make, woman self sufficient secure and prosperous. I
think you have not gone through these and that is the reason you is giving such
statements without studying these facts and figures. Here is the brief
description of women centric schemes of Gujarat Government. Fish
entrepreneur Yojna is for For SC/ST women On Rs. 10,000 unit
cost to buy weighing machines, insulated boxes 50% assistance is given.
Training is also provided. Krishi Talim Yojana is a scheme is
for all rural women farmer’s and farmers wife’s to train them latest
technology. Sakhi Mandal Yojna is a loan scheme where Finance
is provided to catalyse the process of economic development to ensure the
welfare of women, skills development, and the widening framework of micro
finance development. Nari Adalat for women security, Chiranjeevi
Yojana is to encourage institutional delivery in BPL families. Kunverbai
numameru is For daughters of SC, first daughter’s marriage, they can
avail Rs.5000 and Rs.2000 is given to girl’s parents/guardian Saraswati
Sadhna Yojna For SC girls cycles are provided through this scheme. A
sum of Rs. 500 is given to buy a bicycle for girls below 8th grade. For
students in elementary & high school food and lodging are provided free of
cost. Vidhya Sahay and Talim Yojna is For women between
18-40 years who have lost their husbands, this is the scheme for their
empowerment and improvement of economic living conditions. Rs. 3000 is given
under Manav Garima yojna to help them to be self reliant.
Monetary help by application is given to the women (Rs. 500) and Rs. 80 (per
child) every month through the post office. Swayamsiddhi Yojana is
an integrated project for development and empowerment of women, an overall
development of women – social, economic and cultural is initiated by providing
them with the resources through a sustained process of mobilization and
amalgamation of all current projects, with its focus on community oriented
innovations, group formation, building knowledge and mobilization of
activities. Kishori Shakti Yojana It is a part of ICDS scheme,
implemented through Anganwadi centres in both urban and rural. The group of ten
girls between the ages of 11-18 are provided health checkups by the Anganwadi
centres. They are also provided with literacy skills, knowledge about the
health care and decision-making skills. themselves and family Balika
Samruddhi Yojana is an initiative where the focus is to change the
attitude of community towards the girl child and to improve the enrollment and
retention of girl’s child in school, raise the age of marriage for girls. This
is basically for the overall development of a girl child. Gaurav Neeti is
an initiative to create awareness about the social-economic and educational
sector of women and benefit them.
There is many other schemes
successfully executed by Gujarat Government and are supporting/have supported
women for resolving various women-centric issues. This point of concern is
baseless and seem to be away from reality.
Your Concern 2- You are not happy with
land acquisition procedures of the Gujarat Government.
To plan Industrial development, land is
required and it has to be acquired, Sam Either you come up and say that your
Congress VP Rahul Gandhi is against industrial development in the country and
want unemployment to prevail or withdraw from this allegation of land
acquisition. As per “The Gujarat Land Acquisition Bill 2016” that dilutes the
Centre's stringent provisions of the Land Acquisition Act 2013 farmers will
gain as compensation part. In the urban areas compensation paid to land owners
will be 100 per cent of the market value of the land, while in rural areas it
would be 400 per cent. So there should not be any issue with this. You are
talking about Gandhiyan way of development, for your
information Shree Acharya Kripalan said "If ever there was a planner without elaborate
blue-prints, Gandhiji was one. This statement was not from anyone else but “Jivatram Bhagwandas
Kripalani” popularly known as Acharya Kripalani, who was an Indian politician,
noted particularly for holding the presidency of the Indian National Congress
during the transfer of power in 1947. I honour Mahatma Gandhi and his
theories of moral development but if you support Gandhian theory of economy
then you should come forward and say clearly that INC is against FDI and
Globalization. If not, then I am bound to consider this statement as hollow.
Your Concern 3- GDP and GNP doesn’t
matter until larger sections of society are benefited. So that means you want
to say that a larger section of society is deprived.
So either you want to say that larger
sections of society are not benefited or you are against GDP growth of Gujarat.
So here are the figures
Gujarat had lowest
unemployment rate in the country, per-capita income and NSDP is much higher
than national average, so if people are earning well and state is creating
employment then how can you justify your point that larger sections of society
are not benefited in Gujarat. I agree to your point that a large section of
society is still poor, unemployed or underemployed in our country and that
is what we call as mismanagement of 70 years by ‘Indian national Congress”.
you package or Re-brand
Rahul Gandhi by using twitter bots from Russia or India there is a basic
problem with your strategy. The approach of INC doesn’t match with progressive
Indian society. This is the problem and this is the reason why you are not able
to win the hearts of people. The results will be reflected to
you after Gujarat elections and congress will be losing in Gujarat
assembly elections. I really feel that you people are on a three way
crossing where you cannot say that your previous governance was not good and
you have something better, Shree Narendra Modi Government is doing everything
that can be done for the betterment of our nation, so you have no better plans
to present, you are in pressure to present Rahul Gandhi as president of INC. By
playing with SM Bots you seem to be eluding your own party workers by
justifying counterfeit popularity.
Sam if you do not agree
with any of the points that I have stated you can plan an open debate with me
on the same and that’s a challenge.
Although I know that
because your allegations on Gujarat Government are baseless so you may try to
avoid facing me in public.
Regards,
I Agree with Author
ReplyDeleteAnd Ask Sam to Prove his point or Apologize publically
Reply Sam
ReplyDeleteShameless S(c)am!
ReplyDelete